Cursor vs GitHub Copilot

Both are AI coding tools with free plans. Cursor is its own code editor; GitHub Copilot plugs into editors you already use and into GitHub.

Quick verdict by use case

There is no single winner. These picks are based on what each official pricing page lists; try both on your own task before paying.

Pricing and free tier, side by side

CursorGitHub Copilot
What it doesAn AI code editor with agents that write and edit code.GitHub's AI coding assistant in editors, the CLI and on GitHub.
Is it actually free?Free tier with limitsFree tier with limits
Free plan limitsFree ($0/month): limited agent and chat requests.Free ($0): limited chat and agent usage; supports CLI and agent mode.
PricingFree; Plus $8/month (Grok models only); Premium $30/month; Super $100/month; Teams plans available.Free; Pro $10/month; Pro+ $39/month; Max $100/month.
Best forDevelopers who want AI built into their editor.Developers who work in VS Code and GitHub.
Not great forNon-developers: some coding knowledge helps.Non-coders building whole apps from a prompt.
Last checked2026-10-132026-10-13

Official site: cursor.com ↗ Official site: github.com ↗

Strengths and weaknesses

Cursor

Good for: Developers who want AI built into their editor.

Not great for: Non-developers: some coding knowledge helps.

GitHub Copilot

Good for: Developers who work in VS Code and GitHub.

Not great for: Non-coders building whole apps from a prompt.

Other options

Coding & app buildersPaid

Claude Code

Anthropic's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and desktop.

Free? Not included on Claude's Free plan; it comes with Pro and Max.

Coding & app buildersFree tier with limits

OpenAI Codex

OpenAI's coding agent, included in ChatGPT plans.

Free? Included in ChatGPT Free for quick coding tasks in the desktop app (subject to rollout); usage limits apply.

More comparisons

Sources

Last checked 2026-10-13 · No benchmark scores: we only compare what the official pages state. · How we verify · Report an error